Wonderful shockwave presentation of conflicts in the world since 1900. Map

In Alabama judges on the assenting and dissenting sides both quoted from the Bible to support their decision.

It was a child custody case. The decision against the father quotes Psalms 127:3-5, that children are a gift from God, but they come with responsibilities.

The lone dissenting decision cited Romans 13:1-2, which says "there is no authority except from God." Parkker wrote that God, not the state, has given parents the rights and responsibilities to raise their children.

He said "courts should interfere as little as possible with parental decision-making, instead deferring to parental authority whenever it has not been fundamentally compromised by substantial neglect, wrongdoing or criminal act."

Are these judges crazy?

Crooks in High Places

There's Rove-gate and the new energy bill that just passed Congress with a little $1.5 billion gift to Sugarland, Texas, home of Tom Delay. There's CAFTA, where Representatives were just bought off to give huge tax savings to oil companies even though these companies are posting the largest profits in their history. This administration is utterly corrupt. Then there was passing the NRA bill so that gun manufacturers can't be held liable for their weapons. None of the Democratic admendments were in the bill: like prohibiting hollow point bullets or redoing the assault weapon ban. Democrats are the voice of reason and Republicans are the power of corruption. I don't see how any Republican can look at what is happening and think they should remain Republican.

My brother- and sister-in-law from Texas said that the redistricting in Texas that was the scandal of the whole nation, was just done because some districts had become too big. They knew the Republicans had done wrong, and just refused to admit it.

Former CIA analyst Larry Johnson told Democrats that President Bush is jeopardizing national security by not firing Karl Rove for his role in leaking the identify of a CIA officer. He said that leaks hamper efforst to recruit informants in the war on terror.

Instead of a president concerned first and foremost with protecting this country and the intelligence officers who serve it, we are confronted with a prsident who is willing to sit by while political operatives savage the reputations of good Americans like Valerie Plame and Joe Wilson.

Big Media Interlocks with Corporate America

No longer can we use the term "main stream media." Our media has been co-opted by big corporations and should just be called "big media" or "corporate media." When the Carlyle group is represented on the board of directors of the New York Times, we can easily see that independent coverage is at risk.

In a review from Powell's:

To criticize what the media has become is to criticize the Republican deregulation of that medium and their retreat from the public good.

An accounting of the debasing of popular culture might focus on the government's retreat from television. In 1961 John Kennedy's FCC chairman, Newton Minow, went before the National Association of Broadcasters and described television as a "vast wasteland." He vowed to "uphold and protect the public interest" and voiced his disagreement with those who "say the public interest is merely what interests the public." Kennedy's FCC sought to limit advertising to children and increase educational programming. But by the '80s, Reagan's FCC chairman, Mark Fowler, derided the idea of the public interest. Television, he said, was only a "toaster with pictures." Reagan's FCC sought to limit government control of broadcasters.

We saw FOX propagandizing for the Iraq war, but now it never shows the war. FOX shows Hilton Paris and the runaway bride, the missing girl in Aruba and shark attacks -- but nothing on the ongoing war in Iraq. Yes, they are like a toaster with pictures.

Sidney Blumenthal has written about the natural instability in Iraq and why the present government cannot hope to be accepted as truly Iraqi by the majority, the Sunnis.

From the creation of the Iraqi state in 1921 to the army's coup of 1958, Iraq had 58 governments. In 1968, the Baathist Party led by Saddam staged another coup. Some periods of this prolonged instability were less unstable than others, but the instability was chronic and profound. The overthrow of Saddam appears to have returned Iraq to its "natural" unstable state. But in fact the instability runs even deeper.

The Baathists, of course, were Sunnis. Saddam was a Sunni. Before him, the monarchs, beginning with Faisal I, were Sunnis. Before Faisal, the Ottomans, who ruled beginning in the 15th century, were Sunnis. Shiites have never ruled the country until now. Why should the Sunnis, after 600 years of control, accede to the dominance of Shiites?

The present Iraqi government is a ramshackle affair of Shiites and Kurds. The Kurds have no interest in a central authority, and play the game only to solidify their autonomy. The Shiites are maintained as dominant only by the presence of the U.S. occupation army and their sectarian militias. They will never disband those militias in favor of a national army unless they can run the army like an expanded version of the Shiite militias. Prime Minister al-Jaafari and the other Shiite leaders, including Deputy Prime Minister Ahmed Chalabi, have all been Iranian agents or allies, recipients of Iranian largess in one form or another. Shiite Iraqis are natural friends and allies of Shiite Iran. Iraq under the Shiites does not have to be remade in Iran's image to serve Iranian interests. Whether or not sharia (Islamic) law is imposed, Iraqi Sunnis will never see Shiites as Iraqi patriots or nationalists but, instead, as being in league with Iraq's traditional and worst enemy.

Keep your fears to yourself, but share your inspiration with others.
Robert Lewis Stevenson.

I just took a survey for Ode about fear and inspiration. There are so many things we have to be fearful about that it's exhausting. The EPA is testing pesticides on people without their informed consent. They asked people to take gel-tabs filled with pesticides with their morning orange juice. How can that sort of inhumanity be practiced by the United States?

We now routinely torture in Abu Graib, Guantanamo and our gulags. We ship people other countries to have them tortured. Alberto Gonzales said the Geneva Convention was quaint. I believe that the long history and application of the Geneva Convention belies that. How can my country be practicing these things?

There are many inspirations. I have a progressive friend who has decided to run for office. We're starting up a Friday Night at the Progressive Movies here in town. We've started a Progressive Toastmasters Club. I have new friends and everywhere I look the progressives are learning to make their voices heard.

And focusing on our fears plays into the hands of the evil empire.

Isn't it ironic -- the USSR didn't survive -- but neither did we. We became the evil empire. I've read about major transformations in other countries and wondered about the people living there. Remember all the "Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom" in China, where people informed on family members who were re-educated or executed? Or the inflation that hit Argentina. How could people survive when their savings turned into dust? And then they had their "dirty war" where perhaps 20,000 people were taken by the government and never returned. And now here we are , five years into our neo-con future. Where is this one going to end? How many families will have broken by then?

I heard something today: To make peace, don't talk to your friends, talk to your enemies.

This is a good explanation to the stunningly unreasonable dictum that Republicans trot out -- that the reason we have not been attacked here again is that we've "taken the fight to the enemy." There was some idiot who had a letter to the editor saying this just a week or so ago.

TomPaine.com - Rove Tries To Change The Subject: "Finally Karl, please “understand” that the reason we have not suffered a repeat attack on our homeland is because Bin Laden no longer needs to attack us. Those of us with a pure and comprehensive “understanding of 9/11” know that Bin Laden committed the 9/11 attacks so he could increase recruitment for al Qaeda and increase worldwide hatred of America. That didn't happen. Because after 9/11, the world united with Americans and al Qaeda's recruitment levels never increased.

It was only after your invasion of Iraq, that Bin Laden's goals were met. Because of your war in Iraq two things happened that helped Bin Laden and the terrorists: al Qaeda recruitment soared and the United States is now alienated from and hated by the rest of the world. In effect, what Bin Laden could not achieve by murdering my husband and 3,000 others on 9/11, you handed to him on a silver platter with your invasion of Iraq - a country that had nothing to do with 9/11."

http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2005/03/17/media/index3.html

Violence has clearly been decreasing in the Western world for the last 500 years; as far as we can tell from uneven record-keeping, the murder rate in medieval Europe was several times higher than it is today, even in relatively violent societies like the U.S. While the 20th century has seen some spikes in violent crime -- correlating less to the arrival of television than to the proportion of young men in the population -- the downward trend since about 1980 has reinforced the general tendency. As Rhodes puts it, "We live in one of the least violent eras in peacetime human history."

http://www.motherjones.com/commentary/columns/2000/06/violent_media.html

Weighing in on Newsweek

There are many international sources for the Quran being defiled at Guantanamo and denials by the U.S. military mean little; our government holds prisoners in violation of international law and denies them access to independent counsel or human rights groups. Their dismissal of such charges cannot be believed, as they have created an atmosphere of unrestrained torture.

(Washington Post, 3/26/03; London Guardian, 12/3/03; Daily Mirror, 3/12/04; Center for Constitutional Rights, 8/4/04; La Gazette du Maroc, 4/12/05; New York Times, 5/1/05; BBC, 5/2/05; cites compiled by Antiwar.com, 5/16/05).

What we're seeing is the right wing media creating a controversy where none exists.
What they want us to believe is that anonymous sources are fine, as long as they are promoting rather than challenging official government policy. It's all right for your reporting to be completely wrong, as long as your errors are in the service of power.

How can Newsweek be blamed for violence in Iraq when the US has conducted an illegal war there? How minuscule the Newsweek article is in relation to the egregious damage the US has intentionally performed.

The corrupt economic policies of the neo-con Republicans have resulted in a diminished American dream, a future of McJobs for our children and seniors alike.

"One cannot but wonder at this constantly
recurring phrase 'getting something for nothing,'
as if it were the peculiar and perverse ambition
of disturbers of society. Except for our animal
outfit, practically all that we have is handed to
us gratis. Can the most complacent reactionary
flatter himself that he invented the art of writing
or the printing press, or discovered his religious,
economic and moral convictions, or any of the
devices which supply him with meat and raiment
or any of the sources of such pleasures as he may
derive from literature or the fine arts? In short,
civilization is little else than getting something for
nothing."
--James Harvey Robinson,
historian, (1863-1936)

Salon.com | Holy warriors: "In the name of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, democracy without end. Amen."

Salon.com | Holy warriors: "But what would Madison say?

This is what Madison wrote in 1785: 'What influence in fact have ecclesiastical establishments had on Civil Society? In some instances they have been seen to erect a spiritual tyranny on the ruins of the Civil authority; in many instances they have been seen upholding the thrones of political tyranny; in no instance have they been seen the guardians of the liberties of the people. Rulers who wished to subvert the public liberty may have found an established Clergy convenient auxiliaries. A just Government instituted to secure & perpetuate it needs them not.'

What would John Adams say? This is what he wrote Jefferson in 1815: 'The question before the human race is, whether the God of nature shall govern the world by his own laws, or whether priests and kings shall rule it by fictitious miracles?'

Benjamin Franklin? 'The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason.'

And Jefferson, in 'Notes on Virginia,' written in 1782: 'It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself. Subject opinion to coercion: whom will you make your inquisitors? Fallible men; men governed by bad passions, by private as well as public reasons. And why subject it to coercion? To produce uniformity. But is uniformity of opinion desireable? No more than of face and stature. Introduce the bed of Procrustes then, and as there is danger that the large men may beat the small, make us all of a size, by lopping the former and stretching the latter. Difference of opinion is advantageous in religion. The several sects perform the office of a Censor morum over each other. Is uniformity attainable? Millions of innocent men, women, and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined, imprisoned; yet we have not advanced one inch towards uniformity. What has been the effect of coercion? To make one half the world fools and the other half hypocrites. To support roguery and error all over the earth.'"

Yahoo! News - Rove Decries Media Approach to Government: "Rove Decries Media Approach to Government

By STEPHEN MANNING, Associated Press Writer

CHESTERTOWN, Md. - The media have started applying the horse race style of campaign coverage to daily reporting on government, leading to adversarial reporting that can obscure the truth just to create conflict, President Bush's chief political strategist said Monday.



Speaking at a forum at Washington College, Karl Rove said the influx of media outlets and the shrinking shelf life of news in a 24-hour news cycle are to blame.

'We are substituting the shrill and rapid call of the track announcer for calm judgment, fact and substance,' Rove told the crowd of roughly 600 students and local residents.

Naming specific reporters and news organizations, Rove said the media unfairly created the impression that President Bush's No Child Left Behind Act, introduced early in his first term, was stalled in Congress at every step before its passage.

But the legislation was passed by the House and Senate with wide margins and was signed by Bush less than a year after it was introduced, Rove said. He said the media have taken a similar approach to the current debate over Social Security.

'What really gets me is how short the time horizon is for many members of the media of coming to a conclusion of whether something will pass,' he said.

Another example is the 'obsessive reliance' on polls to create news and political predictions, he said. He cited the media's early reliance on ultimately misleading exit polls from Election Day 2004 that appeared to show Sen. John Kerry headed for a presidential win.

'It is as if they (reporters) believe that all polls are created equal,' he said. 'But it ain't so.'

Rove is widely considered to be the driving force behind Bush's 2000 election victory and his win last year over Kerry. Now a deputy chief of staff, Rove is one of the president's closest and most trusted advisers.

Rove countered the general notion among conservatives that mainstream media outlets skew liberal. He said the press corps is 'less liberal than it is oppositional' and admitted to being a listener of National Public Radio.

Of his boss, Rove said the idea that Bush is not an intellectual is incorrect, citing his Ivy League education and saying 'there's always a book on his night stand.'

'He's one of the most intelligent, curious, intellectually tough people I know, yet the country misunderestimates him continually,' Rove said, playing on one of Bush's more memorable verbal gaffes."

Yahoo! News - New pope intervened against Kerry in US 2004 election campaign

Great. The new pope is the one who tried to influence the US election against John Kerry.

Cinematical
Cannes Film Festival List

The New York Times > International > International Special > Europeans Fast Falling Away From Church: "Only 21 percent of Europeans say that religion is 'very important' to them, according to the often-cited European Values Study, conducted in 1999 and 2000 and published two years ago. A similar survey in the United States by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life put the number at nearly 60 percent."

washingtonpost.com: Fox's Sandstorm

William Raspberry says Fox is causing people to think all news reporting is as biased as Fox.

Have you heard people say, 'Well both sides do it." in relation to politics? (Of course, it's not true that both sides have a Tom Delay, that both sides refuse to let opposition into their scripted rallies, that both sides hurl massive giveaways to corporations at the expense of the American people. "Both sides do it" is a Republican rationalization for whatever their current mess is.)

Raspberry is warning that Fox's virulent partisanship makes viewers think other media is similarly biased to the left. The sad thing is that I wish we did have a liberal media.

Why the Liberals Can't Keep Air America From Spiraling In: "
Sure, talk radio is partisan, sometimes overheated. But it's also a source of argument and information. Together with Fox News and the blogosphere, it has given the right a chance to break through the liberal monoculture and be heard. For that, anyone who supports spirited public debate should be grateful. "

Conservative guy says Air American is going down. He says we already have the liberal media so we don't can't fuel a market for radio.

AAAAAARRRRRRGGGGHHHHHHH!

Inequality.org Facts and Figures

The poor get poorer. The wealthier get poorer -- except for that magic 1% at the very top who are lapping it up.

The New York Times > Opinion > Op-Ed Columnist: A Radical in the White House: "Roosevelt referred to his proposals in that speech as 'a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all regardless of station, race or creed.'

Among these rights, he said, are:

'The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation.

'The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation.

'The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living.

'The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad.

'The right of every family to a decent home.

'The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health.

'The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident and unemployment.

'The right to a good education.'

I mentioned this a few days ago to an acquaintance who is 30 years old. She said, 'Wow, I can't believe a president would say that.'"

Tom Delay's House of Scandal

This is a really well-done website. Click on "How tangled up with Delay is your member?" for Washington and read about our Republican representatives and how they've voted.

Is Safeway Sucking Your Soul? / Are overlit, heavily toxic supermarkets making you ill and eating your brain? Why, yes

This column by Mark Morford is great.

AlterNet: Goodbye Uncle Sam, Hello Team Europe

A new poll finds that citizens in 20 out of 23 countries would rather see Europe have more influence in world affairs than the US. Heck, they would rather have China have more influence. A surprising percentage would probably rather have dogs in charge -- oh wait...

Even 35% of Americans would like Europe to have more influence than the US. The vast harm that this administration has done to the world and our standing in the world is ongoing. An administration whose claim to fame is the largest deficits in history and its unilateral military power thrown into Iraq on false pretences has made our country weaker.

Americans work more hours, live shorter lives, and are much more likely to be poor than their European counterparts. The American economy is considerably less worker-friendly, more in debt, and increasingly owned by foreigners. The categories where the United States is the undeniable leader, military budget, government debt, trade deficit, automobile size,­ are dubious achievements.

Where are our values? Where has our country gone? Even now Congress is voting on the bankrupcy bill (written by credit card companies) and repealing the estate tax (affecting the top 7% of
American society.)

GregoireSenateHouseComparisonShort.pdf (application/pdf Object)

Good comparison of the three Washington State budget plans so far. It is really going to be good to get more money for education.

SAlterNet: MediaCulture: Muslim Refusenik

This interview with Irshard Manji is terrific. She wrote "The Trouble with Islam Today." She says that, unlike Christianity and other religions, mainstream Islam is fundamentalist, due to its history. At the end of the 11th century, after the Arab Enlightenment period, the main Muslim leader closed the gates to freethinking. 135 sects were narrowed down to four main ones, with a literal reading of the Koran and enforced fatwas, which she says are a series of legal opinions that scholars cannot question or overturn. Innovation was termed a "fitna," something that divides society. This has persisted until today.

She sees similarity between all fundamentalist religions.

Irshard Manji produced and hosted "Queer Television" and currently produces and hosts "Big Ideas," a interview program with progressive thinkers around the world. She's won awards from Oprah Winfrey, Ms. Magazine, Maclean's, and she's received the Simon Wiesenthal Award of Valor. She is a person who is truly making a difference.

American Fundamentalism

I read a short story by Brian Stableford called, "A Short History of Death," in which he advanced the idea that Puritanism came about after the spread of syphillis through Europe in the 16th century, as "repressive sexual morality was the only truly effective weapon against its spread." Puritanism, and its habits of thought, he says, are directly responsible for the economic and political systems in the West. How interesting that we have our new American fundamentalism in the face of another fatal STD. This is the motivating energy behind a lot of the anti-gay agenda.

Baghdad Burning talks about American television in Iraq.
Don't they get Rush, too?

Riverbend is the Iraqi blogger who writes Baghdad Burning. She tells us that they are now getting American television, which is so sad. After two minutes of women's rights in Afghanistan, 1 minute of army training in Iraq and 20 minutes of Terri Shiavo, along with an interview with Sabrina of Abu Graib fame who never had a seminar on the Geneva convention, she says:

Well, I have a suggestion for a reality show. Take 15 Bush supporters and throw them in a house in the suburbs of, say, Falloojeh (Fallujah) for at least 14 days. We could watch them cope with the water problems, the lack of electricity, the checkpoints, the raids, the Iraqi National Guard, the bombings, and -- oh yeah -- the "insurgents." We could watch their house get bombed to the ground, their few belongings crushed under the weight of cement and brick, or simply burned or riddled with bullets. We could see them try to rebuild their life with their bare hands and the equivalent of $150.

I’d not only watch that reality show, I’d tape every episode

It will be a hard night for Blair on May 5 - Opinion Guest contributors - Times Online
Scary Frank Luntz article on British politics. Interesting that when they merely showed Tony Blair with Bush approval ratings plummeted. What does that say for the Republicans here?

Salon.com Politics:

"The new youth-based cable TV channel Current, or better known by its shorthand, GoreTV, was announced Monday at an industry trade show. With a launch date of Aug. 1, Current will be available to 19 million subscribers. Rumors that Gore was plotting a counter to Fox News with a lefty news channel appear to be unfounded. 'We have no intention of being a Democratic channel, a liberal channel, or a TV version of Air America, that's not what we're all about,' Gore said Monday. (Interestingly though, one of Current's financial backers is Rob Glaser, CEO of RealNetworks Inc., who bailed out Air America last summer when money got tight.)"

I was hoping for more from this "liberal" channel. I guess we'll have to wait and see. He has the same backer who pulled out of Air America right at the start. I hope he doesn't try to cut and run again.

AlterNet: MediaCulture: Right-wing Radio

We've seen here that right-wing religious programming has taken up our public access cable as well. We need to pay attention to taking back the media.

AmBushed! -- A Comedy Musical Mystery

I highly recommend this local comedy production. We went to the previous incarnation and spent hours laughing. This promises to be even better with new songs and outrageous characters! I'll give away some tickets at the PCO training.

What: AmBushed! A Comedy Musical Mystery
When: Friday and Saturday nights April 15 to May 7, 2005 8:30 p.m.
Where: Sueña Coffee & Dessert House, in the old Hollywood Library building, 3930 NE Hancock, Portland
Tickets: $16 - $20 Portland Box office at 503-288-5181

Contact Address: PO Box 13370, Portland, OR 97213-0370
Contact Phone: (503) 288-5181
Website: www.broadarts.org
Email: BroadArts@aol.com

BroadArts Theatre Presents AmBushed!

An Interactive, Raving Mystery that Asks the Musical Question,

How Did The Right wing Beat All Us Smart People?

If you're packed for Canada or singing the Blue State Blues, join BroadArts Theatre at our newest comedy musical AmBushed! Starting April 15, BroadArts will provide relief to all of us overtaxed and blue.

In 16 songs and two acts, AmBushed! rollicks through a demented game of Clue, as we try to solve the mystery, how Did They Beat Us? Perhaps Union Carbide did it in Bhopal with indigestion? Maybe Sinclair Broadcasting did it with the Monopoly Man in a TiVo box? Or did Condoleezza do it as a duet while perched upon a Grand Old Piano with an Elephant? What Elephant, Where? Audience members team up with Miss Scarlet Reputation, Ms. Peacoquette and Mrs. Non-White Anglo-Saxon-Protestant as we all try to resolve our reservations and Get A Clue. Each evening's winner will receive either a $157 billion dollar rebuilding contract in Fallujah or... milk.

Featured in AmBushed! are some of your favorite Broads, including ‘Portland’s Bad Girl of Comedy’ and BroadArts Theatre Artistic Director Melinda E. Pittman as Miss Scarlet Reputation ; former Hallelujah Chorus Member Mollie Hart as Mrs. Non-White Anglo-Saxon-Protestant and ethereal punny-girl Firiel Galloway as Ms. Peacoquette. Dan “Colonel MustardGas” Linn and Aaron “Mr. GreenJeans” Linn round-out the AmBushed! Mystery Band. New songs like “Secretary Condoleezza”, “The County of Love” and “The Blue State Blues” join favorites like “In The Middle of the Right I Move Further to the Left” and “The Boy I Fell In Love With Is A Girl”.

The New York Times > Opinion > Op-Ed Columnist: An Academic Question

Thank you, Paul Krugman, for another seminal editorial.

I know we're not supposed to call the red-state-thinkers dumb, but really. Are we supposed to believe that universities are staffed by liberals because of bias? To me it's self-evident that learning and reasoning are at odds with the "party of theocracy." The fights against evolution and global warming indicate the lack of respect Republicans have for scholarship and science, and there are many other examples as well of Republicans ignoring science and facts. This lack of respect translates into fewer faculty positions.

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment

This is a report on the degradation of worldwide ecosystems which says that we have already used up 2/3rd of our natural resources.

We have a meeting this afternoon to talk about rural strategy. I see our (R) legislators manipulating rural voters by saying that the urban areas want to control them, tax them, who knows what else. They're selling fear. All three of our legislators live in the small towns in the 18th: Ridgefield, Woodland and Kalama, so the urban/suburban areas of the 18th have no representation. Meanwhile the legislators complain that the Clark County Commissioners are controlled by Vancouver so there is no rural representation in the county.

I don't understand rural areas -- but this is by design. My mother grew up in a small town in northern Minnesota and couldn't leave fast enough. She even found a way to finish high school in a larger town. Her mother stayed and ended up being a gossip item because in her nineties she was dating a man twenty years younger than she was. (Way to go, Gram!) When my parents were just starting out, my dad managed dam construction projects. But after six or seven years of moving to one gigantic rural construction project after another, they decided that they wanted the benefits of an urban area with a nice climate. I barely remember the long ride across America in the back seat of our Buick, moving to Portland.

I know there's a lot of agriculture in our Legislative District. Clark County has $54 million a year in agricultural products {broilers, raspberries and strawberries}. We're ranked 21st in 39 counties. If you account for area, we're a lot higher, since we're a small county. We also have over $200 million in food processing here, or over 1280 full-time equivalent jobs for a ranking of 8th in 39 counties, so that a very positive inpact from our rural areas around the state.

We're told that rural voters are practical, fiercely independent people who are afraid of how fast the world is changing. The Republicans are offering a vision of "Father Knows Best" 1950's mind-set that helps them feel safer. (Of course, the Republicans are trying to reinforce the fear as well. I remember looking at a poll before the election that showed that people in red states and red counties were the most afraid of terrorists -- and yet it's the people in the urban areas who actually deal with the threat.) The Democrats don't have a vision right now that appeals to rural voters, and if voters can't imagine a good outcome for themselves in a Democratic world, they won't vote for it. So where's our rural vision?

Outsourcing our Future

See washtech.org for the tens of thousands of engineering jobs that have gone overseas.

There's currently a bill before the state senate that would create a statewide task force to investigate offshore outsourcing and its impact on the state economy. [SCR 8407] There's a similar bill before the house [HCR 4405]. Both bills would need to be voted on by House and Senate in order for the task force to be formed.

AlterNet: How to Turn Your Red State Blue

In this article Christopher Hayes offers advice for reaching the rural voters -- focus on debt. However, we've heard how the Republicans already handle this. They say that the rich people are in the cities and the poor people are in the rural areas. This is where the urban vs. the rural areas play.

State Republicans say that the rich software engineers live in Seattle, and that they can afford to pay more for teachers. According to them the regular people live outside of Seattle and can't afford to keep up. The Republicans won't say that they've sold out to corporate interests and that soon no one will make a middle class wage.

Watching America

This is a great resource! Look at translated news articles from around the world and see what they have to say about America.

From Nancy Pelosi:

The leaders of five Protestant denominations, the Episcopal Church USA, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, the Presbyterian Church (USA), the United Church of Christ, and the United Methodist Church, recently called President Bush's budget "unjust." The leader of the National Council of Churches said that "this budget is immoral and does not reflect the values we hold as people of faith." The Interfaith Alliance declared, "Fairness, compassion, integrity, and justice are the moral principles that should drive the crafting of the federal budget. As a moral document, the federal budget should not, and cannot, be built on the backs of the poor, the elderly and future generations."

This weekend marks the two-year anniversary of the Bush administration's invasion of Iraq. I grieve for the harm we have caused in Iraq. I grieve for the torture and for the deaths. I grieve for the soldiers who have come been killed, wounded, and come to realize that it was all a lie.

In spite of all the propaganda and right-wing media we know one thing for certain: All the rationales posed by the White House as justification for the war have been thoroughly debunked. There were no weapons of mass destruction. Saddam Hussein had no collaborative ties to al Qaeda. Bush's talk of freedom and democracy were afterthoughts to justify a war of his choice. The war is based on oil and winning the 2004 election. It is our Falklands island -- that's why it was supposed to be a cake walk.

The war did not pay for itself and U.S. forces were not greeted with open arms. Today, the U.S. is on track to spend close more than $200 billion for the Iraq war. We are spending more per month than we spent in Vietnam, when adjusted for inflation. In July 2003, there were an estimated 5,000 insurgents fighting against U.S. troops. Today, that estimate is closer to 18,000. And while a year ago, there was an average of 14 attacks against U.S. troops per day, now it's more than 70.

According to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll, 53 percent of Americans said the war was not worth fighting and 70 percent said the number of U.S. casualties is an unacceptable price. Despite the administration's unrelenting propaganda about Iraq, Americans understand the consequences of the administration's actions and don't
like what they see.

We have a protest vigil to go to tonight. See you there.

Fairvue Central >> Bloggies >> Fifth Annual Weblog Awards

You've got to look at these. Some of these blogs are so funny!

Legislative Blogs and RSS Feeds

Blogging has not caught on for national or state legislators yet -- but check out which states have the most legislator blogs going. It Minnesota followed by North Dakota.

t r u t h o u t - MultiMedia
Take a Look at the Red State Road Trip Videos. People who voted for Bush who didn't realize that he's against what they think is right. Aaargh.

Daily Kos :: Political Analysis and other daily rants on the state of the nation.
So, how do you counter a fencing attempt? Here are a few ideas, based on the above:

1. Express outrage, even if the charge is small. Make even the initial fencing attmepts appear outrageous, and explain why it is outrageous. Generally speaking, people find things outrageous when they're told other people find them outrageous.
2. Call the charge out for what it is. Make clear that the "fencer" is trying to change the subject from what actually makes a difference to people. At the same time, make those making the charges look unapproachable, unbelievable and extreme. Example: go after the Swift Boaters as a cultlike group, led by partisans, who have been feeding each other's lies for nearly a year. Make their personal motivations the center of the counterattack. Attack them on the grounds that they're lying, so who can believe anything they say? Fight fire with fire.
3. Respond to the charges immediately. Explain exactly why they're false. Play up the credibility of the target with specific examples where the "fencing" frame simply doesn't fit.
4. In combination with the other tactics, redirect the issue toward what the "fencer" wants people to avoid thinking about.
5. Laugh at the charges (different from "ignore" the charges). Make them and those who are making the charges the objects of ridicule. Does anyone actually believe this?

Just found out that the DNC has a credit card through Providian that pays 1% back. You can either take the 1% back yourself or elect that it go to the DNC. I think I'll let the DNC have it.

Salon.com Politics: "
Money talks

If the Democrats are demoralized, they have a funny way of showing it. Howard Dean, the new chairman of the Democratic National Committee, tells the Associated Press that the DNC has raised $3.4 million in the last three weeks -- more than double the amount it raised in a similar time period just after George Bush took office four years ago.

That's the good news for Democrats. The bad news: The AP says that the Republicans had a 6-1 cash advantage over the Democrats at the beginning of February. The DNC has raised $9.6 million so far this year; the Republicans raised $10.5 million in January alone.

Dean told the AP that he's happy with the progress Democrats are making. 'We're just delighted the fund raising is going better than we had dared to hope,' he said. Democrats stress that Dean has been helping state parties raise money -- efforts that aren't reflected in the DNC totals -- and that the DNC hasn't yet put out a new internet solicitation. Dean promises that will come 'sooner rather than later.'"

Coulter lied and distorted to defend "Gannon," ... [Media Matters for America]

This morning The Oregonian had a front-page article, "Social Security Fight is Getting Dirty" where the right-wing has hired the Swift Boat smear agency to attack AARP. Their first ad is that AARP doesn't support soldiers but does support gays. The left-wing is saying that the Republicans are being inconsistent in what they're saying about social security and that people should check to see whether their representatives are supporting their constituents' positions on social security.

The press runs such things to appear balanced -- but where is the balance. Shouldn't they be pointing out the huge difference between the two approaches? There are some reasonable Republicans who are doing what the Democrats are doing -- but there are no Democrats who are hiring public relations firms to smear the President's proposals. Both sides are not doing this.

Ann Coulter, who gets more air time than liberal pundits, says that the liberal media has gone after Gannon because of his use of a pseudonym. Yet, she says, Clinton, Hart and Kerry all ran under assumed names. Clinton legally changed his last name to his stepfather's last name when he was in high school. Hart's father legally changed the family's last name to Hart in the 1950's. John Kerry's grandfather legally changed the family's name in 1901. Those are not pseudonyms.

FDR's framing message: "There is nothing mysterious about the foundations of a healthy and strong democracy. The basic things expected by our people of their political and economic systems are simple. They are: equality of opportunity for youth and for others; jobs for those who can work; security for those who need it; the ending of special privilege for the few; the preservation of civil liberties for all; the enjoyment of the fruits of scientific progress in a wider and constantly rising standard of living."

From my SO, a LTE for the Columbian:

In defending the supermajority requirement for school funding elections, Ms. Hovde's writing in The Columbian, February 24, 2005, was particularly unfettered by logic, reason or accuracy.

To provide a remedial civics lesson for Ms. Hovde, except in extraordinary cases such as the 2000 Presidential election, the majority does rule. Ms. Hovde is just plain wrong when she makes the statement that "in any given election, the reality is, the majority rarely rules" It is a very simple concept. In the vast majority of elections, whoever gets the most votes - wins. Contrary to the title of her opinion piece, a simple majority is just that - simple! It may not be the majority Ms. Hovde would like to see voting, but it is the majority of voters who vote in an election who rule the outcome of the election. Simple.

Further in her article she states that school employees "make up a good bulk of voters in lots of communities." She references the fact that in Clark County the Evergreen and Vancouver school districts are among the top three slots and the Battle Ground school district rounds out the top ten of the largest employers in Clark County. She then uses this information to conclude that if one were to "Isolate school employees in their given community . . . they can dominate a voting area."

Again, it's back to school for Ms. Hovde for math class this time. If we add up all the employees in every school district in Clark County and we assume that all of them are eligible to vote in Clark County we have a total of about 8100 voters. According to Mr. Kimsey at the Clark County elections office, there are approximately 203000 registered voters in the county. Apparently in Ms. Hovde's world, the 8100 cuts a "large swath" through the 203000.

In her next paragraph she insinuates that the taxes that are levied to support our schools only affect a small group of people, the landed gentry, and those people need to be protected somehow from all those apartment dwellers. The truth is that providing funding for education affects every single person in Clark County and not providing funding for education affects every single person in Clark County. We are all affected by the quality of our schools.

Ms. Hovde's statement that school employees are likely to vote in favor of school levies because it will benefit them personally is completely misplaced. They vote in favor of the levies for the same reason they are teachers. They are committed to providing the best education to the children of Clark County, they believe in what they are doing, and they understand the need to provide adequate funding for schools.

Ms Hovde certainly has a right to her opinions concerning the foibles of our taxation system. If she truly wants to effect a positive change, she needs to work a little harder on the facts and presenting a reasoned approach. In this issue she has resorted to misstatements because to look at it from the 'simple' view she espouses, the 60% supermajority requirement is indefensible. The simple majority should rule. It's a no-brainer.

Jim Hightower
Just when you think you've bottomed out on the level of cynicism it's possible to have toward Washington's constant kowtowing to the monied interests – along comes the "American Jobs Creation Act."

These days, whenever the White House and congress put a positive-sounding title on a piece of legislation, you can bet that the law itself does the exact opposite of what the title so gloriously proclaims.

The American Jobs Creation Act, pushed by George W and enacted last fall, does not create a single job. Instead, it's a massive multibillion-dollar tax giveaway to global corporations. Through this law's "homeland investment" loophole, corporations operating abroad are allowed to have some $400 billion in foreign profits taxed at the bargain-basement rate of only 5.25 percent, rather than the normal rate of 35 percent.

Is this another example of Owellian speech?

NewsMax - Center for the Study of Popular Culture Contributions

Students for Academic Freedom is a neo-con attack against academic freedom. If offers books "Indoctrination or Education: the Peace Studies and Conflict Resolution Program at Ball State University" and "Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam and the American Left." Instead of looking at why more educated people aren't conservatives -- neo-cons just state that it's due to indoctrination.

The war is out there and this is their propaganda.

village voice > news > Generation Debt: The New Economics of Being Young:

The Greatest Generation had the G.I. Bill to pay for college. Baby Boomers got the Pell Grant program in the 1970s, and back then it paid for an average of 50 percent of a public university education, compared to 25 percent today. Students these days are supposed to be grateful that Bush's new budget will allow them to borrow even more, raising the annual limit on federal student loans from $2,625 to $3,500 for freshmen.

Along with that are fewer seats per capita in state universities. We are falling far behind.

HBO Bill Maher 021805
Bill Maher talks about the Jeff Gannon story. LOL.

I spoke to Hayden Reiss, the producer of the Lakoff DVD, today. What a remarkable person! His organization is called "Educate the Base." He came up with the idea of making a DVD of Lakoff after reading Lakoff's book, Moral Politics. He tested it with progressives to determine how long to make it -- and decided on that short format. I think that really works! More discussion comes from having a 20 minute video than from having a 2-hour video. He's done other mini-documentaries, mostly on poets. He's interested in doing more educational videos for progressives, and is using the proceeds from the Lakoff DVD to fund that.
After he made the DVD he tried to get Moveon and other organizations interested in distributing it, but they were so busy with other things before the election that they didn't pick up on it.
Talking to him was really inspiring. It made me feel that there are so many people out there trying to figure out a way to take our country back that we WILL be able to do it. We just each need to play our part.

Guckert/Gannon: Fake Newsman in White House -- Why isn't this being reported?

I have no idea why we aren't seeing anything about the Gannon story in the Oregonian. I know why we aren't seeing anything in the Columbian -- they're Republican shills. They're still publishing lots of articles for a re-vote. Sigh. So one-sided and the major news source for our communities in SW Washington.

Clear Channel adopts more liberal programming

Clear Channel now has 22 liberal talk radio stations and plans to have 20 more by the end of the year. Clear Channnel is, of course, a completely red company.

Clear Channel chief executive Lowry Mays and his wife gave 65-thousand dollars to the Republican National Committee in the last election cycle -- and two-thirds of the company's federal donations went to Republicans -- according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

The company says politics aren't involved in its decision to put liberal talk shows on the air.

Money puts liberal politics on the air. In Portland KPOJ-AM went from 1% to 4% market share when it switched to liberal talk. In Chicago, the WDTW General Manager commented about switching to liberal talk radio,

We are a blue state and a blue region and it just made sense.

Money talks, doesn't it? Just Buy Blue.

Social Security: "AFL-CIO Poll: Key Conclusions & Powerpoint Presentation, Peter D. Hart Research Associates, commisioned by the AFL-CIO, February, 2005."

TomPaine.com - Adjusting For Women:

Representative Bill Thomas (R-CA), chair of House Ways and Means Committee, amazingly floated "gender and race adjusting benefits." In these women should get less because they live longer and blacks should get more because they have shorter lifetimes.

There are other ways to look at this. Women already work for lower wages and spend more time out of the workforce caring for children and aging parents. Let's adjust for that!

"In 2003, the last full year for which we have Census Bureau earnings data for full-time, year-round workers, women earned only 75.5 cents for every $1 men earned. Adjusting women's benefits upward to compensate for that lower pay, would mean an increase in their benefits of 32.5 percent to bring them in line with men's benefits."

The Institute for Women’s Policy Research recently estimated that the typical woman earns just 38 cents for each $1.00 the typical man earns over a lifetime, taking years out of the workforce into account. Social Security benefits are based on the highest 35 years of earnings (and the years women spend at home are averaged in at $0). To compensate women for the impact of this lost time doing unpaid care work, women's benefits would need to be increased by 163 percent—more than double.
Similarly, let's look at the reasons that black Americans live shorter lives and fix those -- better healthcare, more opportunity.

Simple Majority for school levy elections -- Let the People Decide

From Brian Blake, 19th LD.

It’s wrong to let a minority of voters hold our schools back. How can it be fair to elect lawmakers with 50 percent of the vote, but set a much higher bar for our local schools? Legislators should not stand in the way of sending this issue to a vote of the people. This bill has been passing back and forth between House and Senate for many years. It is time to get it out of the legislative hands and send it on to a vote of the people.

In a unanimous bi-partisan vote the House education committee approved legislation that would amend the state Constitution to allow a simple majority of voters to pass a school levy.

The resolution (HJR 4205) would overturn the current 60 percent supermajority requirement first approved in 1932 to pass a school levy. Should it pass the Legislature this year, the decision to amend the state Constitution would go before voters in November.

ChangeThis :: ChangeThis

I'm so amazed at this website. They invite people to write thoughtful "manifestos" about anything, and then watch the ideas spread. I first read the manifesto "Why Craigslist Works, by Craig." The tone is exceptional! It makes you realize how far the media has gotten from thoughtful discourse.

This has the same fresh feel as the reframing sessions that I've attended.

Anais Mitchell Protest Songs

She has a new album, Hymns for the Exiled. Almost like Dylan in the 60's-70's.

"down at headquarters, there's a big database
with black and white photos of the side of your beautiful face
and your library record, and all your test scores
and an invitation to party like it's 1984

baby, don't look so nervous, they just want the facts
and it's all written out in the usa patriot act
cause we don't take no chances in a nation at war
so tonight we're gonna party like it's 1984"

TomPaine.com - The Flickering Light Of America

John Edward's speech talks of American Democratic values. HE is reframing on a grand scale.

Bush counts on ANWR cash

The budget doesn't have any costs for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, any costs for privatizing Social Security, and doesn't include a politically necessary "fix" for the alternative minimum tax that's about to hit middle-income taxpayers, but it does include $1.2 billion dollars from drilling in the Artic National Wildlife Refuge. Why is that?

"The budget is the right place to present the entirety of the president's policies," budget director Joshua Bolten said in response to a question at a noon media briefing in the Executive Office Building.

Unbelievable.

Rove Gets Bigger Role in White House

Rove, who was Bush's top political strategist during his 2000 and 2004 presidential campaigns, will become a deputy White House chief of staff in charge of coordinating policy between the White House Domestic Policy Council, National Economic Council, National Security Council and Homeland Security Council.

GOP_SS_Playbook.pdf (application/pdf Object)

A Republican Strategy Book on Demolishing Social Security

Instructoart | MTV | Wedding

I liked this! Very clear and inclusive.

Sock Puppets of Industry

A continuation from the previous post about a Feb. 3 announcement of a report on why municipal networks are a terrible, anti-competitive idea: In the previous post, below, I dissected BusinessWeek’s blog entry on a new report that will be released on Feb. 3 from the New Millennium Research Council. In this post, I include the announcement’s text after the jump below, and provide some background on each of the people who will be part of the press event.

Confirmation of corporate interests behind anti-municipal wi-fi.

Reframing:

Two great websites:

Frameshop: Politics Gets a Tune-up
Demspeak: Reframing the Progressive Message

My tags can be found on http://del.icio.us/zenpatrice


You can check for reframing tags on http://del.icio.us/tag/reframing

PoliticalConversations.pdf (application/pdf Object)

This article says people are influenced to vote by social networking and conversation. There are very few people who are only influenced by mass media. (Although I think perhaps most social conversations just reinforce the effects of mass media.)

This is the reason that we need to start talking about politics. Many of us didn't talk about politics or religion in groups because it was impolite. Now it's necessary.

United Church of Christ News Release: SpongeBob welcomed by UCC: "SpongeBob receives 'unequivocal welcome' from United Church of Christ"
I'm glad to see that SpongeBob has been able to find a church home.

On Ethics, GOP Displays A Consistent Sense of Timing (washingtonpost.com):

"House Republicans this week again showed their knack for releasing dubious news about ethical matters at moments perfectly timed to draw minimal attention. A few hours before President Bush's State of the Union address Wednesday night -- an event that always dominates the news -- GOP leaders announced they were ousting the independent-minded chairman of the ethics committee, Joel Hefley (R-Colo.), and adding two committee members who had donated to Majority Leader Tom DeLay's legal defense fund"

They have this down to a science, don't they.

Tape Show Enron Arranged Plant Shutdown to Create Crisis

In the midst of the California energy troubles in early 2001, when power plants were under a federal order to deliver a full output of electricity, the Enron Corporation arranged to take a plant off-line on the same day that California was hit by rolling blackouts, according to audiotapes of company traders released here on Thursday.

Lay and Enron denied that they ever manipulated power plants. They did and here is the proof. Such perfidy. Why is it that Martha Stewart went to jail over $50,000 and they didn't go to jail over hundreds of millions of dollars?

I really thank Maria Cantwell for supporting getting those tapes transcribed. If not for her this would have gone unrecognized.

State of Fear: Greetings From the New Flat Earth

I just finished Michael Crichton's book State of Fear (SoF). It's not well-written, but then Crichton has always been more about plot than character development. Most of his novels read like movie treatments: It's his way of making money from them twice. The characters in SoF are thin, but vaguely more appealing than the characters in say, Prey. (The contagonist in that was replicated from nano-bots.)

But SoF is irresponsible at best and opportunistic at worst. Global warming has been politicized, but so have any number of other more significant topics. My theory is that he started to research global warming and found it confusing. Then The Day After Tomorrow came out, he lost his head start and decided to write for the other side. [After all, Mel Gibson was able to buy his own island after The Passion of Christ.] Crichton is now out on speaking tours for the right-wing. Rush Limbaugh, Fox and other conservatives are using his book to bolster Bush's refusal to sign the Kyoto Protocol. Crichton says he's prepared to be a martyr for this book, but it looks like he's planning to be a rich one. Cui bono?

A New York Times article "Michael Crichton? He's Just the Author" talks about Jane Friedman, the chief executive of HarperCollins, who invented the author tour.

One of the biggest contributors to its profitability in the last two years has been "The Purpose-Driven Life," the religious best seller by Rick Warren that has sold 22 million copies around the world. Even a new book by Mr. Crichton cannot top that, and the question of how much more growth the company can get from "The Purpose-Driven Life" looms large in its future.

HarperCollins is starting to market books through direct-to-consumer marketing -- and they already have this huge right-wing internet group from The Purpose-Driven Life and its spin-offs.

So now we'll be debunking SoF. (There are so many Americans who believe that works of fiction need to be refuted: Look at all the books debunking the DaVinci Code: I count 5 on Amazon. Hello. That was a novel, which is a work of fiction.) Here are some sites debunking the basis of SoF Greenhouse, and Real Climate.

And then in the book Crichton links the solid environmental groups with radical environmental groups. Sigh.

The plot line itself: First he sets up his protagonist as a straw man and proceeds to lecture him and convince him through the book that global warming is not real. Doh. I guess we're supposed to be that guy, huh? Then the female interest is given up for dead about four times. She's one tough lady. Her character development is entirely physical: dying, reviving, dying... The environmental disastors are the made-for-Hollywood parts. Towards the end of the book the good guys are captured by cannibals and one of the party is eaten. That was over the top for me. Come to think of it, it was the actor, the shallow representative from Hollywood, who got eaten alive. Maybe Crichton was feeling angry about the acting in his Timeline movie. Timeline was a pretty good book -- again an obvious a movie treatment -- but close enough to science fiction that it could have been a good movie.

From my SO (sent into The Columbian)

In an opinion piece in the Columbian, Friday, February 04, 2005, Steve Titch addresses publicly-funded WiFi access being tested and implemented in some parts of the country. Mr. Titch claims that public investment in access to information is "questionable."

In his article, Mr. Titch comes across as a true advocate for an unsuspecting public, only concerned for the fiscal well-being of the citizens of Philadelphia, Chicago, and San Francisco. Those are some of the places where the politicians are attempting to provide wide-area, low-cost access to information. Vancouver, Washington is another.

Mr. Titch's plaintive cries might ring more truthfully if he was not a mouthpiece for the New Millennium Research Council (NMRC). One step further up the ladder, NMRC is sponsored by an organization called Issue Dynamics, Inc. and to complete the picture, Issue Dynamics is funded by most of the major telecommunications companies in the US. Mr. Titch’s commentary is nothing more than a paid advertisement and should be cited as such.

As I am sure Mr. Titch knows, but does not address, issues such as these are not single-faceted. If publicly-funded or regulated systems such as WiFi are not implemented, the lack of them will incur other costs. If they are implemented by uncontrolled, private enterprise, there will be other costs.

In one of the cases Mr. Titch cited, Philadelphia, Verizon estimated that their profit from the proposed commercial implementation of the plan developed by the municipality would be around $250 million dollars. According to Mr. Titch, the City of Philadelphia should abandon its plan to implement a system at a cost of $10 to 15 million dollars and turn it over to Verizon - the company that estimated a profit of $250 million for implementing the same system.

Mr. Titch is not representing the best interest of the public, but is a shill for the telecommunications industry and his opinions should be weighed accordingly.

Dozens of citizens barred from Bush's speech

"News of the Bush blacklist of dozens of citizens from a Fargo, North Dakota speech is as frightening as it has become routine for this Administration. To blacklist a local citizen because he produces a radio program at odds with the political agenda of the White House is dangerous for Democracy.

This Administration cannot promote freedom and liberty abroad while banning our most fundamental freedoms here at home. The pattern of stifling those voices that do not represent conservative orthodoxy has chilling implications for our Democracy.

Consider these recent cases:

A man is arrested and charged for holding a small “No War” sign at the January Inaugural.

The mother of a soldier killed in Iraq is ejected, arrested and charged while attending a rally for Laura Bush in September.

Across the country, citizens are removed from public sidewalks because “the President had requested a federal protection zone."

The greatness of this country lies in our constitutionally-protected freedoms and liberties. To attempt to ban those freedoms here at home hurts every American."

Kids Come First

In America we should focus on important problems – and having 11 million children in our great country without health insurance is the epitome of an important problem. In America we can stand together to ensure that the children of this country will have a chance to succeed in life. We will provide schooling. If they are ill, we will take care of them. Children are our future and our responsibility. I urge support for John Kerry’s program to Put Kids First.

Q: How many Bush Administration officials does it take to screw in a light bulb?

A: None. There is nothing wrong with the light bulb; its conditions are improving every day. Any reports of its lack of incandescence are a delusional spin from the liberal media. That light bulb has served honorably, and anything you say undermines the lighting effect. Why do you hate freedom?

* * *
(from buzzflash)

Christine Gregoire wants more accountability of state agencies

She has asked the state legislature to become the first state to have a Government Management Accountability and Performance (GMAP) system. Every state department would have to measure how effectively they're performing.

Ted Kennedy Proposes Troop Pull-out

Wonderful speech! Thank you!

Krugman Assails Bush Bigotry

After saying we should pay women less out of Social Security because they live longer, Bush now said that we should privatize Social Security because the system is inherently unfair to blacks. Krugman does a wonderful job killing this argument.

All these new rationales for a set course. Where have we seen this before? Tax cuts. War in Iraq.

The adminstration is trying to find something to play in Peoria. When the liberals laud the Republicans for staying on message they forget this part of the repugnant process -- floating trial balloons and finding wedge issues.

A Moment for Media Reform

In a victory for media reform, the administration has given up on Michael Powell's media monopoly proposals. The Justice Department will not ask the Supreme Court to reconsider a decision by the federal appeals court in Philadelphia which rebuked Michael Powell's proposed deregulation of media. Before Powell one company could own 35% of the national market. That was increased to 39% by Congress in response to Powell's proposals. He wanted to increase it to 45%.

Powell also wanted to let big media own both television and print, but a broad coalition formed against this proposal. The lefties have already seen the loss of independent media. The right-wing felt consolidation would lead to more indecent programming. Republican TV = indecent programming: that was close enough to join ranks.

The networks and media companies argue that the growth of the internet gives enough independent coverage to offset the monopoly they want in print and broadcast media. Were that only so.

I really appreciate Nancy Pelosi's newsletter. You can sign up on her House Minority Leader website. The latest issue has information about the Federal Propaganda Prohibition Act, The Iraq election, the latest Republican attack on Social Security (women live longer so they should get less), the real budget crisis and supporting choice.

On the hopeless/hapless side, I see that the Republicans have completely walked around Brian Baird's commonsense proposal of what to do if members of Congress are eliminated in some disaster -- they're just going to let whoever is left call the shots. Brian has been trying for several years to get a mechanism in place in the case of such a tragedy.

The U.S. House has passed a controversial doomsday provision that would allow a handful of lawmakers to run Congress if a terrorist attack or major disaster killed or incapacitated large numbers of congressmen.
``I think (the new rule) is terrible in a whole host of ways - first, I think it's unconstitutional,'' said Norm Ornstein, a counselor to the independent Continuity of Government Commission, a bipartisan panel created to study the issue. ``It's a very foolish thing to do, I believe, and the way in which it was done was more foolish.''

Viktor Yuschenko is blogging! Here is an English version of his personal web site.

Blair has harsh words for Bush.

"If America wants the rest of the world to be part of the agenda it has set," said Blair, "it must be part of their agenda too."

Too bad the context was environmentalism. It would have had more punch had Blair actually come out against American imperialism.

Tim Eyman in the news again

Tim Eyman is filing an initiative saying that the state legislature can't pass laws restricting initiatives unless they come up for a public vote. Such an initiative won't pass legal muster since the method for passing a bill is in the state constitution. But I don't think Tim Eyman cares about that. After all, most of his previous initiatives have not been legal either.

He also got a couple slaps on the wrist for some PDC filing errors.

I think he's already done enough damage to Washington. His initiative I-695 in 1999 to get rid of the excessive fees on cars was one thing. Years ago Washington had a personal property tax. Taxpayers would inventory everything they owned once a year, have it inspected and pay tax on it. That was too onerous, so it was shifted to taxing a taxpayer's car as a representation of his/her personal property. Over time people forgot that the car was a stand-in for the personal property, and then the car fees seemed exorbitant, especially compared with $30 annual licensing fees across the river in Oregon. The initiative passed, but was legally flawed. The legislature, seeing the overwhelming support for this initiative, cut the rates down to $30 a year per car. Of course our state and local governments had to start scambling for money to replace this revenue.

Eyeman's next initiative, I-722 in 2000, put a cap of 2% on property taxes that public entities could raise. We are fortunate that we are living in the fastest growing part of Washington, because that has saved us from feeling some of the pain from this initiative. That initiative was also flawed, but parts of it were enacted.

More about his history is available here.

It's weird to see political memes sweeping across states. California started the property tax limitation with their Proprosition 13. This spread to Oregon with Bill Pridemore and has resulted in gutting the public schools there. Tim Eyman became the Bill Pridemore of Washington -- making a cottage industry out of awful initiatives. Why does this happen? Are the circumstances just right for these small men to make a difference?

It's uncannily like seeing Bush trying to apply the nationalism lessons from Margaret Thatcher here and then seeing John Howard, Prime Minister of Australia, try to use Bush's ploys there.

No more super-majority

The State Senate is holding a public hearing this Wednesday, January 26th, on SB 5144 and SJR 8202 - Amending the Constitution to provide for a simple majority of voters to authorize school district levies and bonds. If passed by the legislature (a 2/3 vote is required), voters would get to decide whether they want to change the vote required to pass local school levies and bonds from the current supermajority of 60% to a simple majority vote of 50%. Just last year our local school district had to go to the voters twice for a technology issue -- they had a majority both times but the first vote didn't have enough voters. That was a lot of extra expense to put on the election again.

Let's give our senator a call or email him and let him know our views on this.

Census Bureau

Our household was selected to take part in a US Census activity. The four of us have been recording every penny we've spent in the last two weeks. This is a very strange activity because there isn't such a thing as a "normal" week. Who would have thought that in these two weeks I would have bought a new car and had an emergency root canal.

For those considering moving abroad: www.expatica.com

The Meme in Right-Wing Governments

We've seen how Bush thought the war in Iraq would be his Falkland Islands War. That was the cakewalk where the occupying force was greeted as liberators. A lot of nationalism at very little cost.

Now we're seeing Bush trying to privatize social security. Well, that didn't turn out so well for Great Britain.

A conservative government sweeps to power for a second term. It views its victory as a mandate to slash the role of the state. In its first term, this policy objective was met by cutting taxes for the wealthy. Its top priority for its second term is tackling what it views as an enduring vestige of socialism: its system of social insurance for the elderly. Declaring the current program unaffordable in 50 years’ time, the administration proposes the privatization of a portion of old-age benefits. In exchange for giving up some future benefits, workers would get a tax rebate to put into an investment account to save for their own retirement.

George W. Bush’s America in 2005? Think again. The year was 1984, the nation was Britain, the government was that of Margaret Thatcher -- and the results have been a disaster that America is about to emulate.

Why We Need Practice Reframing

Many progressives don't talk about politics because it's not considered polite conversation. In addition, right-wing talk show hosts and talking heads have aggravated the incivility of political dialogue to a point where people are afraid to bring anything up.

This is why I think we all need some training in how to speak about our values in many more areas -- how to be progressive ambassadors.

I'm really enjoying http://www.frameshopisopen.com/

NUMBERS DON'T LIE -- UNLESS THEY DON'T EXIST!

The Bush administration has proposed to end the monthly tabulation of gender in America's workforce, part of the payroll survey of current employment statistics. What is this data used for? Keeping employment records by gender allows researchers to track women's participation in all elements of the workforce. The Labor Department argued the tracking by gender is burdensome on respondents, but in the same proposed revisions they recommended expanding reporting requirements in other areas.

The Congressional Caucus for Women's Issues is speaking out -- telling the Bush administration that, "With a gender breakdown, the payroll survey is capable of painting a reliable picture of where women are working across industries and business cycles. Without a gender breakdown, that picture becomes far more difficult to obtain."

Learn more about the issue here:

http://www.iwpr.org/pdf/IWPRStatementonBLS.pdf

Voice your opinion before the rule is finalized.The Department of Labor will be accepting comments on the proposal until February 22, 2005. Send your comments to:

Amy A. Hobby
BLS Clearance Officer
Division of Management Systems
Bureau of Labor Statistics, Room 4080
2 Massachusetts Avenue NE.
Washington, DC 20212

An Open Letter from the Religious Institute about Abortion

This is a really good letter outlining the religious reasons for safe abortions. They include affirming women's moral agency, respect for life (that all children should be wanted), scripture, moral imperative for access and religious pluralism.

Forum at the Library

Last night we went to a forum moderated by Val Ogden. She is an amazing woman and a great Democrat. She was elected as a state representative for the first time when she was 65 and then served for 12 years. She is still active and effective in politics. She drove up to Olympia first thing yesterday morning, met with most of the legislators and got a bipartisan sign-off on some big medical/mental health project. Then she came back down to Vancouver to host this forum. She is going to be 81 on February 11th and really doesn't show signs of slowing down.

There were two people on the panel: Judie Stanton and Don Carlson. Judie Stanton (D) just stepped down as a County Commissioner and Don Carlson (R) was just defeated for state senator. The forum was meant as a candid discussion of why people would run for election by people who have. However, after listening to this panel I still think it's because candidates are masochists.

Don Carlson was a little tiresome. He's a moderate Republican who had this message for teachers: "Manage your money better." That seemed pretty unfeeling. I wonder what message conservative Republicans have?

Val Ogden talked about how discourse had changed and become less civil. She wondered out loud whether it was due to talk shows or to the party system. Don Carlson hadn't really experienced a loss in civility. I think the explanation for that is that Republicans are ruder than Democrats. They try to emulate the talk show hosts. I have three Republican legislators in my district and whenever I communicate with them I get these rude blasts back, justifying their positions. "I'm sure you'll agree with me that..." and then stating something that no self-respecting progressive would agree with. Just incendiary stuff.

The other thing Judie mentioned was that lobbyists and lawyers are around our elected officials full time while there are very few citizens involved in government. This means that the average citizen just doesn't get the representation that business and special interests do. It was a very interesting evening -- especially after our anti-inaugural rally in the morning.

also from SO: Progressive Groups Join in Protesting Bush Inauguration

January 20, 2005 - Eighteenth Legislative District PCO Ann Warren deserves tremendous recognition and thanks from a variety of liberal and progressive groups in southwest Washington. Ann decided only a couple of weeks before the inauguration that she could not allow the date to go unrecognized by the many people who so strongly disagree with the current administrations policies. She organized a sign waving party on the Evergreen overpass over I-5, followed by a march through downtown Vancouver culminating in a rally at Esther Short Park during the time Bush was being inaugurated in Washington, D.C. Ann was instrumental in organizing a presence from several groups including the Clark County Democratic Party, Vancouver for Peace and Democracy for Vancouver. Our own party patriarch and firebrand Dan Ogden was the keynote speaker. Michelle Cotner, Mike Ellison, Patrice Jacob and Ann Warren also addressed the group of approximately 40 people. There was a moment of silence to commemorate the actual swearing in of Bush as the President for the next four years. Representatives from all the Portland television stations and The Oregonian newspaper attended the rally, filming the activities and interviewing the people present. Vancouver's own Columbian newspaper was conspicuous by their absence.

From my SO:
Greg Kimsey Town Hall

Greg Kimsey, Clark Count Auditor and Republican said he tries to hold two or three town meetings every year. He had the first one since the November election on Tuesday evening, January 12. Greg was elected in 2002 and his term runs until 2006. There were approximately 50 people at the meeting and by this observers estimation approximately two-thirds of them were Republican.

Most of the Democrats attending seemed content to let Greg make his presentation and then listen to the questions asked and the answers were provided. The people asking questions were active, vocal, occasionally confrontative and mostly Republican. The main subject of their questions was the recent gubernatorial election in Washington State. For whatever reason, the Republicans did not seem to be aware of much of the information that has been printed over the weeks following the election. Their questions revolved around three issues:

Why were there more votes than voters?
Why were all those ballots that the Democrats discovered allowed to be counted while those presented after-the-fact by the Republicans were rejected?
Why do we not require all those foreign-looking people to show proof of citizenship in order to let them vote?

I was very impressed by Greg's clear and straightforward answers to all those questions. The answers to the first two questions have been pretty well covered in the news reports, but briefly, the elections division is not all that concerned with crediting votes to specific voters during the counting process. They are more focused on verifying votes and counting them. After all the votes are counted, the election workers then go about the process of 'crediting' voters with having voted. They do this for several reasons, but the main one is that if you do not vote in two federal elections and an additional election your name is dropped from the active voter roles. It is typical in every election to not be able to 'credit' every voter to come up with an exact match between voters and ballots. The total mismatch difference in Clark County is currently at around 200, about the same as it was in the 2000 election. In the weeks after the election was certified in 2000 the election workers were able to get the number down to about 86. That is not bad when you start with over 175,000 votes. Greg said he expected the final tally for the 2004 election to be similar.

On the second question he explained that the 723 ballots that were originally rejected because of a mistake by the King County elections board were allowed to be included in the recount because they had not been fully considered. The law states that fully canvassed ballots cannot be re-assessed during a recount, but that ballots mistakenly excluded from the original count could be included. He further explained that other ballots were rejected because they had already been reviewed and rejected for valid reasons and those reasons had not changed and therefore they would still be excluded.

Greg could not really address the situation in King County, except to say that there had been some mistakes by the elections board and he would do everything he could to make sure that those types of mistakes never happened in Clark County. He did say very plainly that the election, initial ballot counting and all three re-counts carried out in Clark County were fair, accurate and according to plan. He also said that the third recount, the manual recount was the most accurate, in his opinion. He did mention one other factor that points out a striking difference between King County and their processes and our own Clark County. In King County, the average precinct size is around 400 voters. In Clark County the average precinct numbers around 1100 voters.

The answer to the third question was the most interesting. The elections division regularly receives complaints and reports of individuals voting who might not be residents of this country or for some other reason not eligible to vote. They investigate every one of these complaints and to date, not one of them has turned out to be valid. Every person who was alleged to be an illegal voter was in fact a legal citizen and just as entitled to vote as the person filing the complaint.

Another point that he took pains to make was the issue of a paper trail and electronic voting machines. He spent quite a bit of time explaining that having a paper trail was no guarantee that the machine was accurately tallying votes. His example was pretty simple. If a voter selects Candidate A and the machine gives the voter a receipt saying that the vote was cast for Candidate A, that really is not any guarantee that the machine did not actually tally a vote for Candidate B. He firmly believes that when Washington state and Clark County go to electronic voting machines, they will provide a paper trail; he just as firmly believes that the paper trail alone is not enough to verify that the machines are accurately counting the votes. It was an interesting note and one he made several times during the evening.

He talked a bit about the Help America to Vote Act (HAVA) which will take effect January 1, 2006. At that time all voting in Clark County will take place with optical scan ballots. The optical scan machines cost about five times as much and count votes about five times slower than the current punch card machines. There will also be one electronic voting machine in each polling place for the use of voters with physical limitations.

He addressed the issue of military voting. He explained the various processes the elections office had in place so that military personnel would receive their ballots in time to vote. He explained that even though the workers sometimes went to extraordinary lengths to assist the military members, it was hard to assure that a soldier in the hills of Afghanistan was going to get his or her ballot in a timely manner when you were sitting at a desk back here in Clark County. Some of the responsibility was on the military postal service and far out of the control of the Clark County elections officials.

Other items discussed were the Rossi lawsuit regarding the governor's race. Greg did make the point that the suit did not allege any voter or elections fraud, the typical reason that an election might be overturned. On a lighter note he did note that there is all elections officials went to bed the night before an election saying the same prayer. They prayed not that their candidates would win, but that whoever won would do so by a landslide.

He also talked about Secretary of State Sam Reed's recommendations for changes to the elections rules and said that he supported all of them with the exception of changing the deadline for mail-in ballots. Currently mail-in ballots only need to be postmarked by Election Day. Under the recommended change the ballot would need to be received by the elections officials by Election Day.

One of the most talked-about issues of the evening was the proposal of a requirement that voters be required to present some type of identification when they voted at a polling place. This issue was most often brought up by the Republicans in attendance who seemed to be fairly certain that some type of election fraud had taken place in the governor's race due to illegal voting. Greg stated on more than one occasion that those types of processes and checks could be implemented; however there would be a cost involved. It was noteworthy that our Republican friends could be so vociferous in their demands for additional services, but ignorant of how those extra services might be funded.

Overall, Mr. Kimsey did a commendable job of explaining the activities of the elections department. His presentation and the answers to the questions were forthright and credible and while it would be nice to see the position of County Auditor held by a Democrat or possibly even better, to become a non-partisan office, Greg's answers certainly reflected an attitude that demonstrated his commitment to a completely fair and open election process.

Blogger Nick Stoller describes the consequences thus:

"I was idly thinking about social security and how the Republicans are going to privatize it and I had the following paranoid thought.

If the Republicans privatize Social Security then every American will have something most currently don't: stocks. Stocks are a stake in the welfare of our corporations... in the short term.

Stockholders tend to want stocks to go up no matter what the cost to society. Which means that all these new American stockholders will be able to be turned against anything or anyone that hurts stocks in the short term.

These things include:
1. Regulation against Corporate Malfeasance.
2. Corporate Taxes
3. Unions
4. Any cost that corporations claim hurt them in the short term which, according to corporations, is everything except ridiculous CEO salaries and option packages.

For example, when someone like Eliot Spitzer uncovers a major corporate scandal, a Republican will be able to say "He's attacking your retirement fund."

When the employees of a company try to unionize, a Republican will be able to say "they're attacking your retirement fund."

When a community refuses to let a Wal-Mart build in their neighborhood, a Republican will be able to say "They're attacking your retirement fund."

I hope I'm being paranoid. But I don't think I am.

No, I don't think he's being paranoid. I think this is what awaits us in the "ownership society."

How to remove FOX from your cable

Comcast: 1-800-266-2278
Adelphia: 1-888-683-1000
Time Warner: 1-800-638-2882

Just call and ask them to remove it. You can also do this with satellite TV.

The Stop Fox movement has already started to have an effect on their
advertising revenues.

FCC launches investigation of Williams' payola

Using taxpayer money for propaganda is illegal and unethical. According to Williams himself, there are many others who have accepted pay-offs.

Federal Communications Commission Chairman Michael Powell today instructed the Enforcement Bureau to launch an investigation into possible payola violations regarding the $240,000 paid by the Bush administration to pundit Armstrong Williams to promote its education policy.

Salon.com News | The scandal sheet

34 scandals from the first four years of Bush's presidency -- every one of them worse than Whitewater.

The Prosperity Project: Corporate Voter Outreach on the Sly | Personal Democracy Forum

Reframing the message, as important as it is, misses the point that the corporate-media are irretrivably Republican. The Democrats think they invented the internet, but the Republicans used the existing means of communication, churches and business intra/internets, to reach out to millions of people. For instance, the Properity Project, which has been around for five years, is unremittingly Republican, and received almost as many net hits as the two presidential campaign sites combined. This is how the business workers across America came to vote Republican.

MSNBC - Bush says election ratified Iraq policy:

"President Bush said the public's decision to reelect him was a ratification of his approach toward Iraq and that there was no reason to hold any administration officials accountable for mistakes or misjudgments in prewar planning or managing the violent aftermath.

'We had an accountability moment, and that's called the 2004 elections,' Bush said in an interview with The Washington Post. 'The American people listened to different assessments made about what was taking place in Iraq, and they looked at the two candidates, and chose me.'"

This is wrong in so many ways. First, 70% of the people voting for Bush thought there were WMD there. Can he truly think that there is no accountability for Iraq?

MSNBC - Social Security, solvency and political spin
Some good Reagan quotes against using Social Security as a political football.

Bill Fromhold, State Representative for Washington, talked about the Fair Share bill last week. It says that businesses with 50 or more employees have to offer some medical insurance to their workers. It's also known as the "Wal-mart" bill. In Washington State, subsidizing health care costs for employees whose employers don't offer health care costs millions of dollars annually. Of those covered in the Washington Basic Health program, more work at Wal-mart than anywhere else.

Republican Pinhead Quote of the Week

"I'm getting a little fed up with hearing about, oh, civilian casualties. I think we ought to nuke North Korea right now just to give the rest of the world a warning."
-- Ann Coulter

“A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.”

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

Code Pink, Global Exchange, Black Voices for Peace have a video of one of his speeches with updated pictures.